Save the Post Office is edited and administered by Steve Hutkins. The website was created in 2011, when Steve’s local post office in New York’s Hudson Valley was in danger of closing. Steve’s “day job” was as an English professor (now retired) who taught place studies and travel literature at the Gallatin School of New York University. He’s never worked for the Postal Service and has no affiliation with it.

This website provides information about post office closings, suspensions, and consolidations; the historic post office buildings that are being sold; and the fight to preserve the people’s post office. The website also examines topics like the Postal Service’s finances, court cases, and the efforts to privatize the postal system.

Steve was one of twenty people honored by Vice.com as “Humans of the Year” for 2020. Writing for Vice, Aaron Gordon said the “save the post office” project “made Hutkins one of the most consistent independent USPS observers looking out for the best interests of ordinary U.S. residents…. In a way, Hutkins demonstrates the finest example of what a functioning civil society looks like in a year where we haven’t had an awful lot of those. The entire premise of a representative democracy is that most people can’t or don’t want to pay close attention to what the government is doing all the time. But a functioning democracy also requires people, like Hutkins, facilitating an informed citizenry that puts a transparent government to good use.”

In 2011, during its first year online, Save the Post Office was named the “Most Valuable Website” by John Nichols in Nation Magazine’s annual Honor Roll. “Nowhere was the assault on public services more aggressive than in the push to downsize the Postal Service,” wrote Nichols. “And Steve Hutkins’s website, www.savethepostoffice.com, became an essential resource for a network of grassroots groups in all fifty states defending local post offices—along with the idea that the founders were right when they argued that a strong postal service does not just deliver mail; it builds communities and links them as a nation. Best of all, Save the Post Office has made smart arguments for expanding the USPS by doing things like renewing the old postal banking system.”

Unless otherwise noted, all the articles on Save the Post Office are written by Steve.

If you’d like to drop Steve a note, send a note to steve@savethepostoffice.com or use the contact form.

Contact Save the Post Office

Mark Jamison

Mark Jamison, who served for many years as a postmaster in a small town in North Carolina, is a regular contributor and adviser to Save the Post Office. His posts can be found here, and there’s more about Mark here. You can reach Mark at markijamison01@gmail.com.

More about Save the Post Office

One of Steve’s articles about post office closings is cited in United States Postal Service:A Sustainable Path Forward: Report from the Task Force on the United States Postal System.

Steve has written about historic post offices for the National Trust for Historic Preservation (Section 106, Protective Covenants, and Sale of Historic Post Offices), and he submitted testimony to Preserving Historic Post Offices: A Report to Congress, prepared by The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

Steve’s posts have been cited in scholarly articles, including

Save the Post Office has appeared in numerous news articles, including:

In addition to editing Save the Post Office, Steve has filed several comments and briefs to the Postal Regulatory Commission concerning appeals on post office closures and suspensions.

Docket No Filing Date Title
RM2024-9; PI2025-5 8/25/25 Motion for Issuance of Information Request
N2024-1 12/18/24 Statement of Position of Steve Hutkins
N2024-1 11/15/24 Motion for Issuance of Information Request
N2024-1 11/4/24 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories to USPS Witness Arslan Saleem (USPS-T-2)
N2024-1 11/4/24 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories to USPS Witness Stephen B. Hagenstein (USPS-T-1)
N2024-1 10/18/24 Steve Hutkins Notice of Intervention
ACR2022 1/19/23 Motion for Issuance of Information Requests
PI2022-1 5/16/22 Initial Comments of Steve Hutkins
N2021-2 7/21/21 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories to United States Postal Service Witness Foti
N2021-2 7/21/21 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories to United States Postal Service Witness Hagenstein
N2021-2 6/29/21 Steve Hutkins Notice of Intervention
N2021-1 6/25/21 Reply Brief of Steve Hutkins
N2021-1 6/21/21 Initial Brief of Steve Hutkins
N2021-1 6/14/21 Notice of Filing of Corrected Motion to Admit Testimony
N2021-1 6/14/21 Motion of Steve Hutkins to Admit Into Evidence Rebuttal Testimony and Associated Library Reference (Corrected)
N2021-1 6/10/21 Rebuttal Testimony of Steve Hutkins (Corrected)
N2021-1 6/10/21 Notice of Filing of Corrected Testimony
N2021-1 6/10/21 Motion of Steve Hutkins to Admit Into Evidence Rebuttal Testimony and Associated Library Reference
N2021-1 6/10/21 Notice of Filing of Corrected Library Reference
N2021-1 6/8/21 Responses of Witness Steve Hutkins to United States Postal Service’s Interrogatories(USPS/SH-RT1-1)
N2021-1 6/3/21 Steve Hutkins Notice of Designations
N2021-1 6/2/21 Notice of Filing of Library Reference
N2021-1 6/2/21 Rebuttal Testimony of Steve Hutkins
N2021-1 6/2/21 SH-LR-N2021-1/1 – Data Sets for Maps Illustrating Changes in Service Standards
N2021-1 5/24/21 Steve Hutkins Notice of Intent to File Rebuttal Testimony
N2021-1 5/19/21 Steve Hutkins Second Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to United States Postal Service Witness Hagenstein
N2021-1 5/18/21 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories for USPS Witness Thress
N2021-1 5/18/21 Steve Hutkins Notice of Withdrawal of Interrogatories
N2021-1 5/18/21 Steve Hutkins Notice of Withdrawal of Interrogatories
N2021-1 5/18/21 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories to USPS Witness Cintron
N2021-1 5/18/21 Steve Hutkins Notice of Withdrawal of Interrogatories
N2021-1 5/18/21 Steve Hutkins Notice of Withdrawal of Interrogatories
N2021-1 5/18/21 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories to United States Postal Service
N2021-1 5/18/21 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories for USPS Witness Hagenstein
N2021-1 5/17/21 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories to USPS Witness Thress
N2021-1 5/17/21 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories for USPS Witness Cintron
N2021-1 5/17/21 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to USPS
N2021-1 5/17/21 Steve Hutkins Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to USPS for Witness Hagenstein
N2021-1 5/4/21 Notice of Intervention
ACR2020 1/19/21 Motion for Issuance of Information Request
ACR2020 1/19/21 Notice of Erratum
ACR2019 10/13/20 Motion for Information Request No. 4, Seeking Clarification or Correction of Service Performance Report
ACR2019 9/1/20 Request for the Initiation of a Public Inquiry Proceeding into USPS Service Performance Since June 2020
ACR2019 8/21/20 Motion for Issuance of Information Request No. 3 Steve Hutkins
ACR2019 2/7/20 Motion for Issuance of Information Request No. 2
ACR2019 1/15/20 Motion for Issuance of Information Request of Steve Hutkins
PI2016-3 6/14/16 Initial Comments by Steven Hutkins Regarding the Commission’s Section 701 Report
PI2016-2 3/29/16 Reply Comments of Steve Hutkins on the Commission’s Jurisdiction Over Post Office Closings
PI2016-2 2/4/16 Initial Comments of Steve Hutkins on the Commission’s Jurisdiction Over Post Office Closings
ACR2015 1/20/16 Steve Hutkins Motion for Issuance of Information Request
A2015-2 3/30/15 Letter Received from Steve Hutkins Regarding the Careywood, ID Post Office
A2013-5 11/12/13 Response to Postal Service Reply to the Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration
A2013-5 11/12/13 Motion for Leave to Submit Response to Postal Service Reply to Motion for Reconsideration
A2013-5 10/31/13 Motion for Reconsideration of Order Affirming Final Determination
A2013-5 10/31/13 Motion for Leave to Submit Motion for Reconsideration
A2013-6 7/3/13 Petition for Review Received from Steve Hutkins Regarding Bronx General Post Office, Bronx, NY 10451

 

AI on savethepostoffice.com

Here’s what Google’s AI Gemini has to say about the question “Is savethepostoffice.com a reliable source”?

Whether savethepostoffice.com is a “reliable” source depends on what you are looking for: it is widely considered a highly credible source for postal data and policy analysis, but it is also an advocacy site with a specific mission.

Here is a breakdown of its reliability and reputation:

1. Who runs it?

The site is edited and administered by Steve Hutkins, a retired New York University professor. While he has never worked for the USPS, he has become a recognized expert in postal infrastructure. The site also features contributions from former postmasters and postal experts.

2. Credibility and Recognition

  • Media Resource: The site is frequently cited by major news organizations like The New York Times, The Washington Post, TIME, and The Atlantic for its detailed tracking of post office closures and consolidations.

  • Regulatory Involvement: Hutkins regularly submits formal testimony, motions, and “interrogatories” to the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC). His analysis of USPS data is often used in official dockets regarding service standards and network changes.

  • Data-Driven: Much of the site’s reliability comes from its use of official USPS filings, maps, and OIG (Office of Inspector General) reports to explain complex policy changes (like the “Delivering for America” plan) to the public.

3. Editorial Bias (The “Advocacy” Factor)

While the data provided is generally accurate, the site has a clear pro-public service bias.

  • Mission: Its stated goal is to “preserve the people’s post office.” It opposes privatization, many types of “marketization,” and service cuts.

  • Perspective: The articles often critique USPS leadership (such as Postmaster General Louis DeJoy) and argue that the Postal Service should be treated as a vital infrastructure rather than a business.

  • Content: You will find strong opinions alongside the data. For example, it doesn’t just report on a closure; it argues why that closure is detrimental to a community.

4. Comparison to Other Sources

  • Official USPS: Best for official announcements and current pricing, but less likely to highlight the negative impacts of its own policies.

  • Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC): The most neutral source for legal and financial oversight, but their documents are highly technical and difficult for laypeople to read.

  • Save the Post Office: Acts as a “watchdog” that translates these technical PRC and USPS filings into understandable information for the public.

Summary

  • Is it reliable for facts? Yes. It is well-researched and uses official government data as its foundation.

  • Is it neutral? No. It is an advocacy site dedicated to preventing closures and maintaining universal service.

Conclusion: Use it as a reliable resource for tracking USPS changes and understanding the counter-arguments to postal “modernization” plans, but supplement it with official USPS reports if you need the agency’s direct perspective.