POStPlan implementation: 9,000 post offices downgraded, 4,000 to go, RIF's coming

March 23, 2014

The Postal Service is continuing to implement POStPlan, its initiative to reduce hours at 13,000 post offices and replace their postmasters with part-time workers.  At this point, POStPlan has been implemented, or will be implemented soon, at almost 9,000 post offices.  Hours at the remaining 4,000 will be reduced over the coming months.  By October, the institution of the small-town career postmaster will become a thing of the past at almost half the country's post offices.

As best as we can figure it using USPS lists, about 8,800 post offices have had their hours reduced over the past year and a half (including those where implementation is scheduled over the next few weeks).  For another 300 offices, a public meeting was held recently or it's scheduled soon, but no implementation date has been announced.  

That leaves around 3,900 post offices where no meeting has yet been scheduled and implementation has yet to occur.   At many of these offices, there's currently a postmaster vacancy; at others, a vacancy will open up over the coming months if the postmaster can find a new position.  If implementation continues at the current rate (about a hundred a month), some 600 of these post offices will have their hours reduced during the spring and summer.  

In the end, there will be something like 3,300 post offices where the postmaster will still be on the job as of September 30, 2014.  On that date, these postmasters will lose their full-time jobs as part of a Reduction in Force — i.e., they will be RIF’d.

Using some lists that the Postal Service has made available, we've put together the following lists of POStPlan post offices:

  • List and map of approximately 8,850 post offices where implementation has already occurred or been scheduled;
  • List and map of 290 meetings scheduled for February - April, 2014;
  • List and map of 3,920 offices where POStPlan has yet to be implemented or a meeting scheduled.

Note that these lists are based on USPS reports, but some errors inevitably occurred while processing the data.  The official lists of meetings are here; the implementation reports are here.

The masquerade continues: Playing politics with the Postal Service's unfunded liabilities

March 17, 2014

MARK JAMISON

The House subcommittee on Federal Workforce, US Postal Service, & the Census held a hearing on Thursday, March 13to receive testimony on the Postal Service’s $100 billion “unfunded liability.”  Initially the hearing was billed as another Darrell Issa special.  Issa is chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, under which this subcommittee serves, and the hearings he has scheduled to look into controversies and scandal  — real, imagined, or manufactured — have become notorious for showcasing Issa’s brand of political theater and for their pure entertainment value.

Thursday’s hearing was not chaired by Issa, though, and he was nowhere to be seen.  The subcommittee is chaired by Blake Farenthold, a Tea Party favorite from Texas, and his hearing turned out to be rather anticlimactic.  (The video is here.)

Billed as an inquiry into the Postal Service's large and troubling unfunded liabilities, the hearing featured Frank Todisco, the chief actuary from GAO and a regular at postal related hearings.  Jeffrey Williamson, the Chief Human Resources Officer and Executive Vice-President of the Postal Service, was also on hand, as were two actuaries from the Department of Defense (don’t ask why).  Their written statements can be found here.

The centerpiece of the Postal Service’s ongoing financial crisis has been the idea that the agency has accumulated large unfunded liabilities that threaten its very existence.  We are given to believe that the ratepayers, postal employees and retirees, and, God forbid, the taxpayers may be on the hook for billions of dollars of liabilities.  In order to justify their agenda, the downsizers and dismantlers make these liabilities sound as dangerous and threatening as possible, even though the obligations represent decades of costs – in some cases as much as 75 years.

The fact is that the Postal Service is in the situation it’s in today largely because Congress created funding schedules and funding levels for pension and retiree healthcare obligations that exceeded standard accounting practice.  Only the most naïve or ideologically predisposed observer would believe that the way these obligations have been presented and accounted for represents anything other than an attempt to put the Postal Service in the most damaging financial straits possible.

The history of these obligations is long and well known.  We’ve discussed the nature of these liabilities here at STPO many times, including in this recent post that detailed the latest attempts to gin up hysteria through the use of emotionally charged words like “bailout”, “bankruptcy,” and “default.” Rather than repeat the same story again, perhaps it would be useful to take a step back and look at what these obligations represent and what dangers they really present.

Bailout Baloney: Issa holds a hearing on the "Postal Service's $100 billion in unfunded liabilities"

March 10, 2014

On March 13, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, chaired by Congressman Darrell Issa, will hold a hearing called “the Postal Service’s $100 Billion in Unfunded Liabilities.”  Don’t be shocked if you hear the phrase “taxpayer bailout” a few hundred times.

Issa’s hearing is designed to do one thing: show that unless there’s more downsizing of the infrastructure and cutbacks to service, the Postal Service's large pension and health care obligations will inevitably lead to a taxpayer bailout.  

The witness list isn’t out yet, but Issa will probably bring over someone from the GAO or the OPM to testify about the magnitude of the obligations.  Between questions for the witnesses, Issa will speechify about how mail volumes are falling due to the Internet, how the unions and their Democratic allies in Congress refuse to face realities, and how government doesn’t work so things are best left to the private sector.

But there's a lot more to the story of "unfunded liabilities" that's not likely to come up at this week's hearings, so here’s a preview of the numbers Issa and his witnesses will be talking about along with a more reasonable assessment of the situation.

Sale of the Bronx General Post Office moves forward: Final offers due March 12

March 7, 2014

Next Wednesday is the deadline for submitting bids to purchase the historic Bronx General Post Office.  The Postal Service is apparently proceeding with its plan to sell the building even though Congress has recommended a moratorium on the disposal of historic post offices. 

Thanks to the efforts of Representatives Barbara Lee of California and José Serrano of the Bronx, Congress included two provisions concerning the sale of historic properties in the Appropriations Bill passed earlier this year.  

The first said that the Postal Service “should refrain” from selling historic buildings until the Office of Inspector General (OIG) completes its audit investigation on the disposal and preservation of historic post offices (p. 75). 

The second directed the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) “to report on the action plan for ensuring USPS compliance with Section 106 responsibilities during the divestment of historically significant properties”(p. 89

The OIG report may come out this month; the ACHP report is due out on April 17.  The Postal Service, however, is not waiting for these two reports to be completed.  

According to the USPS-CBRE Properties for Sale website, the Postal Service has set March 12, 2014, as the deadline to submit “best and final offers” for the purchase of the Bronx GPO.  (The initial deadline was January 15, but for reasons unknown the deadline was extended.)

The call for best offers requests that interested parties submit offers that respond to two possible scenarios — an outright purchase of the property and a purchase that includes a long-term USPS lease for a portion of the building so that it can continue retail operations in the building.  Prospective buyers are also asked to describe their development plans for the property under both scenarios.

Sign the petition

On Privatization

Good Reading on Postal Privatization

Also: Sarah Ryan's "Understanding Postal Privatization: Corporations, Unions, and the "Public Interest"

save your p.o.

Organizing to Save Rural Post Offices


A Community Organizing Toolkit

Revised November 2012

[pdf doc] [word doc]

follow us

Follow Save the Post Office.

 

RSS feed for Save the Post Office articles

 

RSS feed for Save the Post Office News Briefs

 

Links & Topics