May Day Postal Rally in NYC


April 29, 2013 – New York City 

The Postal Service is under siege — New York City post offices put up for sale, Postmaster Donahoe’s failed attempt to cutback mail delivery to five days, and the rush to close mail processing plants throughout the nation.  

These cutbacks in services have the biggest impact on people who most depend upon the post office — the elderly, the disabled, disabled veterans, the poor, and small business owners.   The cutbacks must be stopped.

Join the May Day March to Save the People’s Post Office on Wednesday, May 1. 

The March will culminate in a “mail-in” at the Peter Stuyvesant Post Office, with marchers “occupying” the lobby as they attempt to mail oversized “post cards” to government officials who have the authority to reverse the disastrous dismantling of the people’s post office. 

What:  May Day March to Save the Peoples’ Post Office

When:  Wednesday, May 1 2013 (May Day)  High Noon

Where: Start at Washington Square Park and go to Peter Stuyvesant Post Office, 432 East 14th Street.

Why:   Enough is Enough! There must be an immediate moratorium on the destruction of the infrastructure and network of the people’s post office. 

Who:   Occu-Evolve, Occupy Wall Street,  the New York Metro Area Postal Union, Community/Labor for Postal Jobs and Services,  Communities and Postal Workers United

What's up in the Heights? The Postal Service relocates a post office, forgets to tell anyone

April 27, 2013

Over the past few weeks, there have been several meetings in New York City about the Postal Service’s plans to close historic post offices and move retail services to smaller spaces.  Not many people attended the first of them — about the Bronx General Post Office — because it was held in the morning and with little advance notice.  

But three subsequent meetings — on the Triborough (Tito Puente), Old Chelsea, and Peter Stuyvesant stations — were packed with frustrated and angry citizens, worried about what the closures and relocations will mean for postal workers, seniors, small businesses, average customers, and the neighborhood as a whole. 

A fifth New York City post office is also set for closure — the Washington Bridge Station at 555 West 180th Street.  Retail services and post office boxes will be relocated to a smaller space a couple of blocks away, at 518 West 181st Street.  The new space is about half the size of the current space, so letter carriers will probably be transferred to other facilities.

The Washington Bridge relocation has been in the works for several years, so it won't come as a big surprise to the community.  But for some reason, the Postal Service has not included this relocation in its discussions with city officials, and there hasn’t been an announcement about a public meeting or comment period.  The Postal Service seems to be treating the Washington Bridge closure as a done deal.  That’s because it is.


A "possible" candidate for closure

Originally named after the nearby George Washington Bridge over the Hudson River, the Washington Bridge post office was renamed the Sergeant Riayan A. Tejada Post Office in 2004, in honor of a Marine hero killed in Iraq.  It's located in Washington Heights, at the northern tip of Manhattan, in a primarily Dominican neighborhood.  (The Heights was the scene for a reality TV show that had a short run recently.)  

In July 2009, the Postal Service informed workers at the Washington Bridge station that the office would be closing because the landlord wanted a big rent increase.  Customers would need to go to another post office, like the 192nd Street post office, over twelve blocks further uptown.  

That announcement met with strong protests from the community, and the post office remained open.  There was talk of a closure again in October 2009, but then a last-minute lease extension kept it open.  

In April 2010, Congressman Charles Rangel met with Postmaster General John Potter to lobby on behalf of the post office, and Rangel was told that the Postal Service was working on another lease extension with the landlord and looking for a new, smaller location. 

Nothing more seemed to happen after that, at least not in public view.  Behind the scenes, the Postal Service continued to arrange lease extensions, apparently with the help of elected officials.  One extension (May 2010 to June 2012) went into effect just after Rangel met with the PMG.  The current extension runs until June 30, 2013.  


The new location

It looks as though the Postal Service found the new location for the Washington Bridge post office sometime in early 2012.  According to the USPS facilities list, a ten-year lease for the property at 516-518 181st Street went into effect on April 1, 2012.  The facility is identified as "Washington Bridge Retail."

Postal Vision 2020 looks at the future of "postal services" and sees privatization

April 22, 2013

The third annual Postal Vision 2020 conference will take place this week in Washington, DC.  The conference brings together speakers from a variety of backgrounds for what the Postal Vision website describes as a "provocative, candid conversation about what Americans should have in the way of ‘postal services’ in 2020 and beyond and who should provide them.”

More about postal privatization:


The title of this year's Postal Vision 2020 is "Positioning America for the New Millennium," and much of the conference will be about innovations in the mail industry, like digital solutions and eCommerce.  But that reference to "postal services" and "who should provide them" indicates that the conference may be about something else as well.  Judging by who's speaking at Postal Vision 2020, it's likely that one of the conference's main themes will be privatization of the Postal Service.

Three of the conference's big name speakers were recently involved with a study about a proposal to privatize half the Postal Service by creating a “hybrid public-private partnership.”  The study was conducted by the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) with funding from Pitney Bowes, one of the two platinum sponsors for Postal Vision 2020. 

The proposal calls for transferring the retail and processing operations of the Postal Service to the private sector, leaving the Postal Service with the delivery end.  Over half the Postal Service — $35 billion in operating costs — would be handed over to private companies — companies like Pitney Bowes.

The Postal Vision 2020 website doesn't say a word about the NAPA-Pitney Bowes privatization study, but you can be sure it's on the agenda.


The NAPA-Pitney Bowes privatization study

The NAPA study was conducted with financial support from Pitney Bowes, amount unknown.  The study purports to be objective and independent, but Pitney Bowes is anything but a disinterested observer of the country’s postal system. 

The corporation received over $30 million from the USPS in 2012, and it's number 49 on the list of Top USPS Suppliers for 2012.  Besides benefiting from direct payments for services rendered, Pitney Bowes profits off the Postal Service in other ways.  PB is the country’s largest presort corporation.  It consolidates, processes, and transports mail, which then qualifies for workshare discounts with the Postal Service.  The system ends up giving private companies work that could be done (and used to be done) by postal workers, and many of the deals cost the Postal Service money because the discounts are larger than the costs avoided 

If the hybrid public-private model were implemented, something on the order of $30 billion in mail processing costs would be transferred from the Postal Service to the private sector.  Pitney Bowes stands to make billions off such a privatization scheme.  No wonder it was happy to fund the NAPA study and to provide generous support to the Postal Vision conference, where the study can be discussed in a high-profile way.

Twenty Minutes at the PRC: Postal workers protest the plant consolidations

April 15, 2013

Last week postal workers took the fight to stop the consolidation of mail processing plants to the nation’s capital.  On Wednesday, April 10, employees representing several communities and APWU locals traveled to Washington, DC, to meet with their elected officials and protest the Postal Service’s decision to accelerate the consolidation of 55 mail processing plants that had been scheduled for 2014. 

Several APWU locals have also filed formal Complaints challenging the Postal Service’s plan with the Postal Regulatory Commission.  While in DC, union representatives and other postal workers attended a meeting of the PRC to make their case in person.  The video above includes the audio of the twenty or so minutes they spent talking to the Commissioners at the end of the meeting.  (You can listen to the podcast of the entire PRC meeting here.) 

The postal workers were accompanied on their visit to the PRC by Congressman Sean Patrick Maloney (NY-18), who wanted to testify on behalf of the hundreds of employees at the Mid-Hudson Postal and Distribution Center in Newburgh, New York.  Maloney was the first member of the House of Representatives to testify in person before the PRC.

“I’m outraged at the Postal Service’s decision to consolidate the Newburgh facility an entire year earlier than the original deadline,” said Congressman Maloney, “and I will continue fighting to ensure that this consolidation does not impact employees or their families.”  You can listen to Rep. Maloney’s entire statement to the Commission here.

The complaints and the comments to the PRC may spur the Commission to do something, but as Chairman Ruth Goldway said at the end of Wednesday’s meeting, there’s not much the PRC can do. 

“We’re the regulator, not the operator of the Postal Service,” said Goldway, “and what the law directs us to do is somewhat limited, especially when it comes to plant operations, but we will look at the complaints that you filed and we will consider the comments you made about efficiency and service and we’ll see what it is possible that we can either advise the Postal Service to do or direct them.”

The Mid-Hudson Area APWU Local was the first to file a complaint about the consolidations with the PRC.  Similar complaints have since been filed by APWU Helena Local 649 (Helena MT CSPDC); Greater East Texas Area Local (East TX Processing & Distribution Plant in Tyler TX); Red Bank Area Local (Monmouth P&D Center in NJ); the Bakersfield Area Local (Bakersfield P. & D. in Bakersfield, CA), and Booklyn Local 251 (Brooklyn P&DC).   More complaints are expected to be filed over the coming days. You can read more about the complaints in this previous post.

On Privatization

Good Reading on Postal Privatization

Also: Sarah Ryan's "Understanding Postal Privatization: Corporations, Unions, and the "Public Interest"

follow us

Follow Save the Post Office.


RSS feed for Save the Post Office articles


RSS feed for Save the Post Office News Briefs


Links & Topics